Categories
40kccg Personal strategy

Exploring New Formats

This week, we explore why casual formats may reinvent the game for you!

As a Magic player, I am always interested in trying new formats, casual or otherwise. From well-established formats such as EDH/Commander to the obscure and forgotten (anyone remember Tiny Leaders?), I think a strong marker of a good card game is the ability to customize the card pool to your liking.

Obviously, as an out-of-print card game, the Warhammer 40K CCG global playgroup is fairly small (if it even exists at all), and so for you, the current format is basically “whatever cards you can acquire”, and your meta is “whoever you can convince to play with you”.

I find that this, for me, makes gameplay fresh and exciting. Why? Consider the experience arc of every CCG player. The most thrilling period for every card player is when they open their first starter deck and booster packs and begin delving into the game. Every new card brings a world of possibilities, and you are naïve to the jaded, harsh reality that is the competitive metagame.

I have spent a lot of time in the past year collecting and building new decks, and I build each deck to win. The reality of the game is that each faction has a competitive ceiling, and once you build and play towards those ceilings, you realize that a significant chunk of the card pool simply isn’t suited to that level of play. As a result, many interesting cards just don’t see the light day because they’re rendered inadequate when compared to other cards.

For example, every competitive Space Marines deck will likely play Apothecary Singa, Squad Faustus, and Miller’s Bodyguard. Every competitive Chaos deck will probably play Khorne Bloodletters, Traitor Space Marines, and Tzeentch Flamers. For decks like these, at least 12 out of your 60 deck slots have been accounted for. As a semi-Spike, I realize the need for optimization, but I also realize that it comes at the cost of creativity.

The upper limits of optimization and competitiveness are appealing for many CCG players, but understandably not as important when it comes to dead/OOP CCGs, because let’s face it – there aren’t any tournaments happening anytime soon. So, there’s more of an excuse to explore suboptimal – and dare I say, more fun – configurations of the game.

As an example, let’s explore a thought experiment: what if we played a version of the Warhammer 40K CCG that did not include Pandora Prime, the first set? For this, let’s not even consider rares.

Space Marines lose the above mentioned cards: Apothecary Singa, Squad Faustus, Miller’s Bodyguard, among others.

Chaos loses Khorne Bloodletters, Traitor Space Marines, Chaos Space Marines, and Tzeentch Flamers.

Eldar lose Kaura and Lockesis.

Orks lose extra-BA enablers such as Goff Boyz, Freebootas, and Warbike Squad.

Already, we are beginning to see a wildly different format without Pandora Prime. Is this format better? At the very least, I believe that the power level would be drastically reduced across the board, which would give room for many lesser-played cards to shine. Is it more fun to play? I have no idea, but that’s part of the fun – to explore the game in ways undiscovered by anyone else. And in this time of card scarcity, this is the perfect opportunity to see the game in a new light, with fresh eyes.

Other ideas to consider:

  • Peasant and Pauper formats (banning rares and uncommons)
  • Duel decks (building two decks specifically against one another)
  • Pure generic decks – break out those Tiks!
  • “Block constructed” decks – e.g., Alaitoc vs. Catachans
  • Fluffy theme decks – Death Guard and Iyanden players unite!

I hope this adds some food for thought for your collecting and playing. What interests you? Let me know in the comments!

5 replies on “Exploring New Formats”

Highlander might be an interesting way to play 40kCCG. Or maybe theme decks with alternate win conditions (e.g. a Chaos cult deck which attains flags for playing certain cards and an inquisitor deck that gains flags for stopping it)

Really though, if you have a library of strong decks, you and a grind could spend a year of gaming evenings playing (and fine tuning) them against one another before things felt stale.

Or maybe that’s just me because I have fewer chances to play the game than I’d like

Like

On a related note, what I would suggest exploring for old players is to have sideboard in your deck. Non-MTG players might feel uncomfortable but I think it really does good to the diversity of decks and strategic thinking in deck building.

For example in sideboard games, you can swap in Planetary Defense Cannon against opposing decks that use extra BAs, instead of putting 4 in your “main/only deck”. You can bring in cards that add firepower or Command Bunker when you face Space Marines. You may include Minefield in sideboard if your deck is weak to assault units. You may side out cards that deal damage to characters if you face Tyrants, etc.

The bad thing about deck building and gameplay in the original Warhammer 40k CCG is that you are incentivised to build the most streamlined version of your deck to do whatever it’s supposed to do in the most efficient / best way. “Hate cards” are too situational to include for a lot of decks because hey… you only have first wave + 6 cards for 1 round of deployment. Drawing 1-2 irrelevant cards doesn’t feel good. With no (or not enough) hate cards in your deck, once you know your deck cannot interact with your opponent in some axis, or your strategy is naturally weak to them, you feel bad since it’s kind of a “non-game”. If you include some hate cards in your deck and you actually win because of them (under the current rules with no sideboard), well… your opponent feels bad.

Having sideboard adds another layer of strategic thinking in deck building to cover your own strategy’s weaknesses in my opinion. “Mulligan” is also good to include in order to mitigate non-games.

Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s